Our Best Stuff on Roger Stone, Free Speech, the Taliban, and Architecture

It was, once again, a busy week.

There’s a famous scene in State and Main in which Alec Baldwin’s character tries to launch a station wagon from a ramp. He flips the car and skids into a lightpole. Phillip Seymour Hoffman’s character rushes to see if he’s OK, and Baldwin just laughs and says, “So, that happened.” 

That’s pretty much how we feel by Friday afternoon each week. This week on the 2020 primary front, Michael Bloomberg earned his way onto the stage for the Nevada debate, but probably wished he hadn’t. Longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone was sentenced to prison, after lots of back-and-forth about the proper sentence and possible political meddling in the process. Donald Trump, who has issued very few clemencies during his term, pardoned Rod Blagojevich, Bernie Kerik, Michael Milken, and several others. And the New York Times ran an op-ed by a U.S designated terrorist without disclosing that fact—or many, many others. We took a deep breath or two and tried to cover it all.

Should Attorney General Barr Resign?

Jack Goldsmith, former assistant attorney general under George W. Bush, continued his good work for The Dispatch on the Roger Stone sentencing. A group of former federal prosecutors and Justice Department officials called on Attorney General William Barr to resign, but Goldsmith cautions “not so fast.” Barr certainly created some problems for himself but, “Despite his mistakes, Barr clearly understands the importance of the appearance as well as the reality of even-handed justice, and very few people who are qualified to be attorney general have the stature to stand up to President Trump the way that Barr did last week. If Barr resigns, Trump can appoint an “Acting” replacement who will surely be more compliant.”

The New York Times Publishes a Terrorist Pushing Taliban Propaganda

There was a bonus Vital Interests newsletter this week from Tom Joscelyn, who took time out of long-planned Disney vacation to weigh in on a curious editorial decision by the New York Times. The digital ink was barely dry on his Wednesday edition—looking at how the United States might get out of Afghanistan without re-creating the conditions that got us there in the first place—when the New York Times published an op-ed by the deputy leader of the Taliban. Since the NYT didn’t provide much background on Haqqani, Joscelyn, in his just-the-facts-ma’am style, reminded readers that Haqqani is a designated terrorist with a $10 million reward on his head, and that Haqqani, whose father helped train Osama bin Laden, and helps run the infamous Haqqani network, had extensive ties to al-Qaeda. Haqqani played the NYT, which allowed him to portray himself as an advocate of peace just one month after the Haqqani network’s media arm released a video celebrating suicide bombs targeting “crusader invaders”—that is, American troops and our allies. Joscelyn’s analysis generated lots of attention in military and intelligence circles—it’s easy to see why. 

The Architecture of Owning the Libs

Everyone’s a critic. That’s what we learned when the Trump administration drafted (but has not not issued) an executive order that would establish a preference for classical architecture in new federal buildings, a move that is--not surprisingly--being hailed by Trump fans and derided by liberals. Sherri and Robert Tracinski critique the arguments on both sides and then serve up a little Architecture 101. “We've been warning for a while about how the left has been adopting didacticism as their dominant school of art, where every song, movie, comic book, and statue is judged by its political message. … The Trump administration's proposed mandate for classical architecture is the exact same hectoring didacticism, but from the right,” they write.

The Morning Dispatch: Stone Sentenced

One thing we try to do at The Dispatch is to give you strong reporting and informed commentary in different media—whether newsletters, standalone articles, or podcasts. Other morning newsletters provide short vignettes of bigger stories, some round up the news from other places, and we do some of that too. But Friday’s edition of The Morning Dispatch had two original items that would have made for very strong pieces by themselves. First, there’s a helpful explanation of what happened at the Roger Stone sentencing and how Judge Amy Berman Jackson arrived at the duration of 40 months. Second, we used the occasion of Trump replacing acting DNI Joseph Maguire with Ambassador Richard Grennel to look at how the president employs “acting” senior officials who do not undergo Senate confirmation.

Other highlights from The Dispatch this week:

  • Sure, The Morning Dispatch take on the Nevada debate was pretty OK. But frankly we were surprised that no one beat us to this headline: Bloomberg Stopped, Frisked.

  • There might be people out there who don’t like dogs. We don’t know any, and we probably wouldn’t trust them if we did, but for those of us who do, good news: Canines are great for making people better citizens. Science!

  • In the French Press, David did a deep dive on the seeming contradiction between college students enjoying more legal protections for free speech than they have in decades, and a new study that shows that conservative students often self-censor and don’t feel free. 

  • On the podcasts: Jonah talked to historian Tevi Troy in one episode of the Remnant and our own Andrew Egger in the other. On Advisory Opinions, David and Sarah talked about Andrew McCabe and also about Harvey Weinstein’s lawyer, and The Dispatch Podcast gang had an energetic conversation about the Democratic presidential field, presidential pardons, and the media.

Loading more posts…